The John F. Kennedy Assassination - 1195 Words

The day of November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas was a big one. In fact, it is one of the most talked about topics in all of America. The John F. Kennedy assassination. Till this day in 2016, fifty-three years later, this is still a very relevant topic. What really happened that day? Who really assassinated him? Was it someone that actually had something against JFK as an individual, or was it, as most people think of it, a conspiracy theory? I am going to talk about the life of Kennedy before presidency, during and how it led to one of the biggest tragedies in America. May 29, 1917 in Brookline, Massachusetts, the nations first born president in the twentieth century. Kennedy grew up in a wealthy home with wealthy parents. Much like our current president-elect, except in this case, Kennedy was much cooler and not irritating. Kennedy grew up in a home with political history because his grandfather was Mayor of Boston. Kennedy’s father made his wealth in the stock market and other big businesses. His father working in the stock market made him able to take his money out before the big crash of 1929. Thus, still being a wealthy man and having his nine children enjoy their life as a wealthy family. The Kennedy family grew up privileged going to expensive private schools, going around the seas or lakes in their boats and visiting their summer homes where all the fun happened. After the kids had their fun, it was time to focus on a more serious matter, which was going to college.Show MoreRelatedThe Assassination Of John F. Kennedy982 Words   |  4 Pages O’Reilly and Dugard’s book, Killing Kennedy, is about the events leading to President John F. Kennedy being shot, as well as what happened after the assassination. This book also describes the rise and fall of John F. Kennedy. The authors also wrote about the Cold War, Kennedy dealing with communism, and threats of crime. January of 1961, the cold war was growing stronger and Kennedy was struggling with communism. During all of this happening, he was learning what it meant to be a president. HeRead MoreThe Assassination Of John F. Kennedy1620 Words   |  7 Pages Ever since the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963, there has been controversy over whether the true gunman was held accountable. The United States Government claimed that it was an easy, open and closed case. They found Lee Harvey Oswald, close to ground zero, with a freshly fired riffle, immediately after JFK was shot. Contrary to the governments report, skeptics argue a vast scope of conspiracies to shed light on what they believe happened that day; ideas ranging from magic bullets, multipleRead MoreThe Kennedy Assassinations By John F. Kennedy Essay1486 Words   |  6 Pages Decades later, the Kennedy assassinations and surrounding mysteries continue holding public interest. Although their notoriety as charismatic leaders is a significant contribution, other factors regarding societal psychology deserve consideration whilst exploring this phenomenon. With these events occurring during a time that allows living witnesses, modern accessible evidence, various media covera ge, and visible modern impact, the mysterious Kennedy assassinations have the capacity to encourageRead MoreJohn F. Kennedy Assassination1618 Words   |  7 PagesJohn F. Kennedy Assassination Was John F. Kennedy’s assassination a single shooter or was it a conspiracy? Since November 22, 1963 people around the world have wondered who it was that shot President Kennedy, and what for. So many questions have formed around this event, not just about who the shooter was, but also questions like what might the world have been like today if the shooting didn’t happen? The Kennedy assassination has been a mystery for many years. A lot of people hear about the differentRead MoreAssassination Of John F. Kennedy1002 Words   |  5 PagesThe Assassination of John F. Kennedy â€Å"Our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal.† President Kennedy stated in his commencement speech at American University on June 10, 1963. John F. Kennedy was an American politician who served as the 35th President of the United States from January 1961 to his assassination in November 1963. There are numerous conspiracy theories involving Kennedy’s assassinationRead MoreAssassination of John F. Kennedy931 Words   |  4 PagesThe John F. Kennedy assassination is believed to be one of the most controversial and debated topics in American History. JFK was one of the most beloved presidents of our time. Other assassinations of presidents didn’t have as many Conspiracy theories compared to the JFK assassination on November 22nd, 1963. Some of the theories include a Government cover-up, Mafia influence, and Cuban President Fidel Castro (Stern). T he assassination of John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, raised many questions thatRead MoreThe Assassination Of John F. Kennedy1500 Words   |  6 PagesOn November 23, 1963, three shots were fired at President John F. Kennedy’s limousine in Dallas, Texas. The first shot went through the president’s neck, the second was the fatal shot that would ultimately end Kennedy’s life. There is a lot of speculation about what really took place in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Many people believe that Lee Harvey Oswald worked alone, but there are many people across the nation who think differently. Many theories can both support and disprove that LeeRead MoreThe Assassination Of John F. Kennedy Essay967 Words   |  4 PagesThe book I chose to read is The Assassination of John F. Kennedy by Lauren Spencer. It was published in 2002 by The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc. It contains 64 pages. This book not only provides information on the killing of President Kennedy, b ut also information on his life, the arrested murderer s life, and more interesting background information and details. This books main objective is to go deeper into the case of John F. Kennedy s assassination, to discuss personal information about suspectsRead MoreAssassination of John F Kennedy1119 Words   |  5 Pagessixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository Building. However, did Lee Harvey Oswald, a crazy lunatic act alone in the assassination of President Kennedy. Both first – hand knowledge and visual evidence allows people to re – examine the events of this day and prove that there were other gunmen involved in the bombardment of our youngest elected president. John F. Kennedy was depicted as a nationwide hero to many Catholics living in the U.S. during the early 1960’s. He was idolized by severalRead MoreThe Assassination Of John F. Kennedy1626 Words   |  7 PagesThe Assassination of John F. Kennedy John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, was assassinated on November 22, 1963 at 12:30 p.m Central Standard Time in Dallas, Texas while riding in a motorcade in Dealey Plaza.[1] Kennedy was fatally shot by Lee Harvey Oswald while he was riding with his wife, Jacqueline, Texas Governor John Connally, and Connally s wife, Nellie, in a presidential motorcade. A ten-month investigation by the Warren Commission from November 1963 to September 1964

Reconstruction in America - 971 Words

The period of reconstruction in the south was a period of social reconstruction on a scale not previously seen in American history. The Reconstruction era occurred after the Civil War period, and lasted from 1864 to 1877. The Reconstruction period brought upon an era of Martial Law, a change of social consciousness towards slavery and the rights of African Americans, a New South with closer ties to the North. Emancipated Slaves, Northerners, and White Southerners all had different opinions towards the New South and the new found freedom of the emancipated slaves along with the various concepts of freedom. â€Å"We believe our present position is by no means so well understood among the loyal masses of the country, otherwise there would be†¦show more content†¦Provided that the provisions of this section shall not be so construed as to allow any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto to rent or lease any lands or tenements, except in incorporated town or cities in which places, th e corporate authorities shall control the same.† (The Civil Rights of Freedmen in Mississippi 414). Another example from the Black Codes providing the belief that Blacks had enough freedom was â€Å"Be it further enacted, That all freedmen, free Negroes, and mulattoes may intermarry with each other, in the same manner and under the same regulations that are provided by law for white persons: Provided, that the clerk of probate shall keep separate records of the same.† (414). During the period of reconstruction after the Civil War, The Reconstruction era occurred after the Civil War period, and lasted from 1864 to 1877. The Reconstruction period brought upon an era of Martial Law, a change of social consciousness towards slavery and the rights of African Americans, a New South with closer ties to the North. During the years of Reconstruction, AfricanShow MoreRelatedThe And Its Effects On America s Reconstruction866 Words   |  4 Pagestaxes for government aid programs . While examining South Africa’s reconstruction, Tutu noted that â€Å"Harmony, friendliness, (and) community are the greater goods. Social harmony is for us the greatest good. Anything that subverts, that undermines this sought-after good, is to be avoided like the plague.† He noticed that his nation received greater benefits when the people personally controlled amnesty instead of the courts. Likewise, America receives greater benefits when its citizens control charitableRead MoreThe Reconstruction of America after the Civil War1078 Words   |  4 Pagestheir next move towards reuniting the divided America was going to be. The period following the end of the Civil War would become known as the â€Å"Reconstruction Era.† An era that raised just as many questions as it did answers. A reconstruction of America that seems to carry on many decades later. The reconstruction of America would decide how the south would rejoin the Union, what was to become of the nearly 3 million black slaves freed, how America was going to recover from such a devastating internalRead MoreAmerica Needs A Second Reconstruction Era1425 Words   |  6 Pagesis a lie. Racism is not dead; America has elected a president that ran a campaign off of it and people of color are still vastly disadvantaged and underrepresented. We are not all created equal; white women make seventy-four cents to a dollar of a white man’s, and women of color make even less. Over seventy percent of men in prison are men of color. The majority of this country’s poor are immigrants and people of color. The fight for freedom for all is not over. America, we have problems and the solutionRead MoreThe Reconstruction Era Was A Time For America To Heal,1375 Words   |  6 PagesThe Reconstruction Era was a time for America to heal, a time to recuperate and move forward, but certain things take longer than others. One issue that took tremendous effort was the advancement of African-Americans. Freedman were freed by law, but still mentally, socioeconomically, and socially bonded to oppression. Even after the Civil War ended, the fight wasn’t over; there was a war within the government itself, and a greater fight for freedman to achieve economic freedom without barriers. AsRead MoreMassive Changes During the Reconstruction Era of America817 Words   |  3 Pages As a country, America has gone through many political changes. Leaders have come and gone, all of them having different objectives and plans for the future. One period of time in which leaders sought change was 1865 which was the time period known as Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a time period of many different leaders, different goals and different accomplishments. Many debate whether Reconstruction was a success or failure. Success is an event which accomplishes its intended pu rpose,Read More The Failure of the Post Civil War Reconstruction Period in America674 Words   |  3 Pages After the North won the civil war, it was time to rebuild this nation. This period of reconstruction was supposed to have a profound change on society. Unfortunately this was not the case. Reconstruction did not fundamentally alter this nation. Not to say that nothing happened, but nothing that really made a change or difference happened. First, the control of the south was given right back to the planter elite. Also, even though slavery was abolished; blacks were not free. FinallyRead MoreThe Numerous Changes to America from Reconstruction to the New Deal1582 Words   |  7 PagesAmerica following Reconstruction was completely different from America during FDRs New Deal. In 1876, the government was based on the ideas of Laissez-faire which meant that government stayed out of the citizens lives. Society in 1876 was dominated by white men who ran the country w hile there were no rights for women, blacks, and immigrants. In 1876, Americans lived on farms in rural America. By the 1930s, America was a welfare state with government just starting to control different aspectsRead MoreThey Say: Ida B. Wells and the Reconstruction of Race, by James W. Davidson. Ida B. Wells as a parallel to African Americans trying to gain empowerment in post-emancipation America1409 Words   |  6 PagesLana Cox History 121 Professor Adejumobi November 7, 2008 Critical Book Review THEY SAY: IDA B. WELLS AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF RACE By James West Davidson Ida B. Wells, an African-American woman, and feminist, shaped the image of empowerment and citizenship during post-reconstruction times. The essays, books, and newspaper articles she wrote, instigated the dialogue of race struggles between whites and blacks, while her personal narratives, including two diaries, a travel journal, and anRead MoreThe Shaping Of Our Country1092 Words   |  5 Pagesseveral different factors, each contributing to it in their own way. Four of the major pivot points that occurred consists of: Jeffersonian democracy, Jacksonian democracy, Civil War/Reconstruction, Revolution/Constitution. However one of them happened to be the most impacting which was the Civil War and Reconstruction. The American Civil War occurred during 1861 to 1865, lasting only five years. America’s bloodiest clash resulting in the death of approximately 620,000 Americans and millions moreRead MoreWhy Did Reconstruction Fail870 Words   |  4 PagesWhy did Reconstruction fail? Reconstruction in the United States is historically known as the time in America, shortly after the Civil War, in which the United States attempted to readdress the inequalities, especially of slavery and many other economic, social and politically issues including the poor relationship between the North and the South of America. These problems were highly significant in America, and a variety of groups in government tried to resolve these problems, but this only led

What is NATO for Free Essays

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is some 1949 alliance involving 26 North America and Europe nations. It objectives are to protect the se4curity and freedom of member states though military and political means. NATO is the principal security association within Europe. We will write a custom essay sample on What is NATO for? or any similar topic only for you Order Now The alliance helps shield allies have modernized their shared strategic theory, upheld NATO’s amalgamated military organization, and carry on conducting mutual military scheduling, exercises and training. The allies have generated fresh fora and policies for boosting dialogue with previously communist nations of eastern and central Europe. Most importantly, NATO has had a major contribution in the enforcement of UN Security Council deliberations within what was once called Yugoslavia (Kaplan, 2004, 22). NATO has some significant function in controlling and containing militarized disputes within eastern and central Europe. It even strives to evade such conflicts by vigorously encouraging stability in what was once the Soviet community. NATO aided in stabilizing Western Europe, the states of which were formerly usually bitter enemies. Through solving the dilemma regarding security as well as offering some institutional system for building of shared security strategies, the alliance has had a contribution in rendering utilization of forceful modes as regards the relationships of the nations within such a region almost inconceivable (Duffeld, 1995). NATO persists in the enhancement of member country security with regard to external hazards through a number of methods. Firstly, NATO upholds the tactical balance within Europe by counterbalancing the lingering danger emanating from the Russian military strength. Secondly, is assists to tackle emerging fresh dangers, encompassing the intricate dangers that could result from the disputes among and within the nations of eastern and central Europe. Thirdly, it obstructs such dangers from occurring by working towards nurturing stability within what was once the soviet community (Churchill, 2006). Western European countries strive to uphold some counterbalance to former Soviet Union’s residual armed forces power, particularly the nuclear ability of Russia. Another post-cold war function of NATO is shielding of member states from an assortment of freshly emerging dangers. More focus has been directed to potential perils emanating out of Middle East and North Africa, partly due to the proliferation of expertise for developing missiles as well as weapons of mass destruction within such areas. The most prominent among fresh external dangers are however, territorial, ethnic as well as national disputes among and within the eastern and central European nations. These disputes are able to produce many immigrants or as well overflow into neighboring nations’ territories, NATO member states included. In the most extreme of cases, outside nations could sense the compulsion to get involved, thus stoking broadening of enmity, as happened at the start of World War II. Despite the fact that NATO has not been able to terminate such conflicts so far, the alliance assists in tackling the issues emanating from the disputes through a number of modes. Firstly, NATO shield member nations from probable overflow of armed forces hostilities. Although none of NATO member nations has ever received serious threats in such a way, the alliance’s extensive experience in arranging member nation defenses ensures NATO is adequately ready to handle such emergencies (Sandler, Hartley, 1999, 16). NATO as well assists other nations to avoid being inducted into such conflicts. NATO’s existence assures member nations located near such a zone that they will receive assistance in tackling nearby conflicts in the event that such conflicts shoot up and overflow, thus minimizing the motivation to unilaterally get involved. Instead, the presence of NATO assists in ensuring that military participation of western nations in these disputes, if at all it happens, is consensual and collective. The likelihood of some quick, coordinated response from NATO could deter other nations from interfering (http://www. nato. int/docu/speech/2003/s031103a. htm). NATO in 1992 reached a consensus to avail NATO property in the support of peacekeeping actions sanctioned by the United Nations (UN) Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE). At the beginning of 1994, NATO as well endorsed the construction of some mechanism named Combined Joint Task Forces (C JTF) which would allow member coalitions (coalitions of the willing) to utilize shared alliance possessions for particular actions outside the accord zone. Most spectacularly, NATO has acquired vital experience in what was once Yugoslavia. NATO personnel have imposed the Adriatic maritime barricade as well as a no-fly region over Bosnia. NATO as well offered defensive air authority for United Nations ground forces. They utilized the warning of air ambushes to secure seclusion regions for serious arms around the united nations-selected safe Gorazde zone and Sarajevo. Pursuant to the disintegration of socialism, numerous former soviet community nations have embarked on aggressive economic and political reforms. Europe has substantial stakes in such efforts because failure may result to mass migrations, Domestic strife, armed disputes and direct dangers to surrounding NATO member states as well. NATO encourages stability within the previous soviet community through 2 ways. Firstly, the alliance directly nurtures political restructuring success within the area. Starting in 1990, the alliance has initiated a broad spectrum of institutions and programs for consultation regarding security concerns, most conspicuously the Partnership for Peace (PfP) and the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACC). NATO may utilize such initiatives to aid the young regimes to restructure their security structures, planning procedures and policies (Greenwood, 1993). Such fresh arrangements may particularly strengthen democratic management of the military as well as reverence for civilian power through inducting eastern and central European heads to western civil-military associations’ models. Secondly, the alliance boosts eastern and central European security though reassuring such nations that they will be assisted in case they receive outside threats. This helps such states to abandon possibly destabilizing activities as well as to follow their aggressive domestic restructuring agendas with more confidence. Starting from 1990, NATO’S North Atlantic Council has constantly issued candid oral statements of awareness as happened during 1991’s soviet coup d’etat attempt. The NACC permits states in the former Soviet Union to state their issues as well as discuss varied issues regularly as they engage their counterparts in NATO as identical partners. The freshly approved PfP provides every member official dialogue with NATO, in the vent that such a member perceives some direct danger to their security, as well as solid military liaisons with NATO member states through contribution to several military operations and activities (http://www. ato. int/docu/speech/2003/s031103a. htm). Since its formative years, NATO has significantly worked towards normalizing relationships among member states. Extremely important among NATO’s intra-alliance roles is reassurance. NATO’s existence assures member states that they should not fear each other. The alliance minimizes th e likelihood of disputes among western European member states in 3 ways including: increasing stability; tying the US to Europe so as to guarantee the upholding of the equilibrium of authority within the area; and inhibiting re-nationalization of such nation’s security strategies. A significant likely cause of conflict between nations is misunderstanding and misperception among nations. Without reliable and detailed data, policy makers could overstate the offensive armed capacities of other nations or misconstrue foreign objectives, usually regarding them as being more antagonistic that they are in the actual sense. They as well are inclined to overlooking the safety issues their own activities could arouse abroad (Kaplan, 2004, 41). Therefore, international relationships are usually characterized by mistrust and suspicion. NATO assists in avoiding the mergence of such damaging dynamics; it instead encourages mutual self-assurance though facilitating elevated intra-alliance honesty. Contribution to NATO’s force strategizing procedure requires member states to share detailed data regarding their armed forces, defense financial statements as well as future strategies. Owing to this institutionalized transparency, member states only hide a few secret from their counterparts, and they possess minimal motivations to do likewise. NATO also nurtures reassurance for member states through undertaking integration of members’ security strategies. To different but normally significant extents, Nations formulate as well as implement their defense strategies jointly as members of NATO as opposed to on exclusively state basis. Such security strategy denationalization neutralizes the usual competition and enmity for military supremacy that could otherwise happen amongst the key European big shots, it also assists to prevent any usage of armed forces posturing to attain political clout in Europe (Churchill, 2006). In case re-nationalization happens, this could result to issues regarding internal inequities within Western Europe as well as arouse fresh competition, conflict and mistrust. NATO encourages security strategy denationalization in a number of ways. NATO’S consultative arms, force scheduling procedures as well as integrated armed systems assist to develop a shared identity amongst member states. Frequent and comprehensive dialogue results to an elevated level of common understanding. Cooperative force scheduling assists reshape member states armed forces posture in order to reflect NATO-wide, as opposed to, national concerns. Also, assignments to NATO’s military associations and civilian officialdoms socialize military personnel and state officials into some shared NATO customs. Additionally contribution to NATO’s combined military system fosters minimized military independence among member states, particularly within central Europe; because it permits members relinquish or at the minimum deemphasize several components vital for an autonomous military capacity. Numerous European nations, For instance, rely heavily upon the alliance’s multinational space early caution force as well as its combined air protection structures. Small as well as big nations have given up their capability to undertake particular missions, like the sweeping of mines and air surveillance, with the intention of husbanding security resources, after having known that counterpart allies could undertake such missions (Duffeld, 1995). International integration develops a measure of shared control through increasing the extent of joint contribution to operational and organization planning. Therefore, the persistent existence of the multinational military system imposes restraints upon the capability of numerous member states to utilize their armed personnel for purely state objectives, at any rate on the short-to-medium period, as well as assures members regarding the shared objective of their armed might. Without NATO, the likelihood of one nation’s forces raising alarm within another nation would be greater (http://www. direct. gov. uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/UKgovernment/TheUKandtheworld/DG_073420). NATO member states regard maintenance of the alliance to be mutually advantageous to them, since it carries on the performance of a number of essential security roles, both internal and external, including incorporation of Canada and the United States into European defense matters. NATO has as well adapted impressively to the dynamic European defense environment, positive example being the experience in Bosnia. Whereas the joint defense of NATO territory is the core function of the NATO alliance, the fresh NATO, through widening its key role to incorporate peacekeeping and crisis handling as well as encouraging cooperation and partnership, including some strategic association with Moscow, has emerged to be the backbone of some European joint defense regime (Sandler, Hartley, 1999, 67). How to cite What is NATO for?, Papers

Hiroshema Essay Example For Students

Hiroshema Essay HiroshemaWar is an ever changing, advancing typeof combat. From swords to guns, the weapons used are always developingand becoming much more powerful. Nuclear bombs are one of the mostforceful weapons that exist today. On August 6, 1945, during WorldWar II, the United States dropped an Atomic bomb on Hiroshima, a Japanesecity and Military center. About 130,000 people were reported deadinjured, or missing. Another 177,000 were left homeless. Itwas the first Atomic bomb ever used against an enemy. The effectsof this explosion were so devastating and long lasting that they are stillfelt today. Was the United States justified in the droppingof the atomic bomb?On December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor was deliberatelyattacked by the Japanese. Reports show that 2,400 people were killed and1,300 were wounded. The reason Japan bombed, Pearl Harbor was because thatwas where all of the U.S. Navy ships were kept. They were hoping to takeout the Navy and were almost successful. They expected the aircraf t carriersto be in the harbor, but luckily were not. Although the attack may havebeen a success to the Japanese, it became a huge mistake in the end. Onereason it was a mistake was it caused the U.S. to enter the war. The UnitedStates was the ultimate cause to Japan losing the war. Secondly it madethe Americans angry and determined to destroy the Japanese. Recruitingoffices were flooded with young patriots who wanted to help their countryout. This attack was just an example of what could have happened if thewar had continued. If the war had continued another attack on U.S. soilcould have taken place. This could have turned the 6,000 dead Americancivilians into 9,000 dead civilians. That is one of the main reasons thewar needed to be stopped immediately. The United States made the thought of theAtomic bomb and the building of it possible. The power behind sucha weapon was just what the United States needed. Many scientistsmanufactured and constructed the Atomic bomb, including Enrico Fermi, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and Harold Urey. The group was headed by a UnitedStates Army engineer, Major General Leslie Groves. The United States came up with a list ofcities that could be possible targets for the detonation of the bomb. The list included Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. Theylater decided that Hiroshima would be the first target. Then in theearly hours of August 6, 1945, the B-29 bomber Enola Gay, along with threeother B-29s, headed out from Tinian Airbase to Hiroshima. They equippedthe Enola Gay with the A-bomb, a single 4-ton nuclear device with 12 poundsof uranium. At 8:15 a.m. (Japanese standard time) the Enola Gay letthe Atomic bomb fall to the ground. The bomb exploded around 2000feet above the ground. The explosion caused all wooden buildingsto collapse within a radius of 1.2 miles. The blast itself demolishedthree fifths of the city within seconds. The United States scientistsestimated that only 20,000 Japanese would die, instead 75,000 people perishedinstantly. Three days after the bombing of Hiroshimait was decided that another Japanese town must be hit with am A-bomb. Three targets remained, the city of Kokura was the chosen target. Because visibility was so poor, due to smoke and pollution they changedthe target to the city of Nagasaki. The smoke and pollution werejust as bad over Kokura, but through a gap in the smog the bombardier spottedthe target. They then released the 4.5 ton bomb, at 11:02 a.m., killing30,000 people instantly. A day after the Nagasaki bombing the Japanesegovernment offered to surrender. This ended the first ever nuclearwar. .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 , .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .postImageUrl , .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 , .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:hover , .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:visited , .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:active { border:0!important; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:active , .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813 .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u96e34ccf4139f688feb81aed64b6a813:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Beta Carotene EssayYet, while the first atomic bomb was asuccess, it raised many ethical and controversial issues. Most ofthe people in the United States of America supported the use of the atomicbomb, even President Truman commented on what a great invention itwas. Many people, including the scientists that developed thebomb, opposed the bombings and felt that killing that many innocent peoplejust to get an influence in the war was immoral. One famous figure,Albert Einstein was quoted saying, I made one great mistake in my life,when I signed the letter to President Roosevelt recommending that the atomicbombs be made.The atomic bomb was considered a quickand even economica l way to win the war; however, it was a cruel and unusualform of punishment for the Japanese citizens. The weapon that we referto as quick was just the opposite. On one hand, it meant a quick endto the war for the United States, and on the other hand, a slow andpainful death to many innocent Japanese. The effects of radiationpoisoning are horrific, ranging from purple spots on the skin, hair loss,nausea, vomiting, bleeding from the mouth, gums, and throat, weakened immunesystems, to massive internal hemorrhaging, not to mention the disfiguringradiation burns. The effects of the radiation poisoning continued to showup until about a month after the bombing. In fact the bomb also killedor permanently damaged fetuses in the womb. Death and destruction comehand in hand with war; however, a quick death is always more humane.